M.D. v. Halifax Insurance Co., [2001] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 71

Successfully represented the insurer in dismissing a claim brought by an assessment company for Section 24 assessments. The insurer was awarded its expenses and filing fee because the proceedings were found to have been an abuse of process. There is also a discussion about principles of contempt of court, in circumstances where a party fails to comply with an Order of the tribunal.

Cited in:

Do v. Allstate Insurance Co. of Canada, [1997] O.I.C.D. No. 232; 

Smith v. Citadel General Assurance Co., [2001] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 94; 

Sellathamby v. Allstate Insurance Co. of Canada, [2001] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 131; 

Tesfai v. Allstate Insurance Co. of Canada, [2001] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 194; 

Shearstone v. York Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., [2002] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 5; 

Hodgins-Babin v. Coseco Insurance Co., [2002] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 16; 

Sellathamby v. Allstate Insurance Co. of Canada, [2002] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 188; 

Docoute v. Zurich Insurance Co., [2002] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 104; 

Dhir v. RBC General Insurance Co., [2002] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 13; 

Smith v. Citadel General Assurance Co., [2002] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 116; 

Mostajo v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co., [2002] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 151 (Oct. 25 2002);

Tanzos v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, Co., [2002] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 154; 

Sellathamby v. Allstate Insurance Co. of Canada, [2002] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 50; 

Ellis v. Peel Mutual Insurance Co., [2003] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 34; 

D’Angelo v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co., [2003] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 66; 

Amoa-Williams v. Allstate Insurance Co. of Canada, [2003] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 108; 

Glinka v. Dufferin Mutual Insurance Co., [2003] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 107; 

Khaledi v. Allstate Insurance Co. of Canada, [2003] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 106; 

Langdon v. Pafco, [2003] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 105; 

Driver v. Traders General Insurance Co., [2003] O.F.S.C.D. No. 159; 

Stelzer v. Zurich North America Canada, [2004] O.F.S.C.D. No. 14; 

DeMartini v. ING Insurance Co. of Canada, [2004] O.F.S.C.D. No. 33; 

L.F. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., [2004] O.F.S.C.D. No. 76;

Sivaloganathan v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., [2004] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 102; 

Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivaloganathan, [2004] O.F.S.C.D. No. 138; 

Dicerbo v. Citadel General Assurance Co., [2005] O.F.S.C.D. No. 65; 

Kong v. Personal Insurance Co. of Canada, [2005] O.F.S.C.D. No. 88; 

Sorokin v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co., [2005] O.F.S.C.D. No. 105; 

Ramalingam v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., [2005] O.F.S.C.D. No. 115; 

Villers v. Pilot Insurance Co., [2006] O.F.S.C.D. No. 14; 

Hejnowicz v. Coachman Insurance Co., [2006] O.F.S.C.D. No. 130; 

Haider v. Royal & SunAlliance Insurance Co. of Canada, [2006] O.F.S.C.D. No. 11; 

K v. TD Home and Auto Insurance Co., [2006] O.F.S.C.D. No. 156; 

Martucci v. Economical Mutual Insurance Co., [2007] O.F.S.C.D. No. 90; 

Al-Shimasawi v. Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Co., [2007] O.F.S.C.D. No. 82; 

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Ramalingam, [2007] O.F.S.C.D. No. 145; 

G. v. Pilot Insurance Co., [2007] O.F.S.C.D. No. 153; 

Lesniak v. Pembridge Insurance Co., [2007] O.F.S.C.D. No. 234; 

Miller v. Optimum Insurance Co., [2008] O.F.S.C.D. No. 122; 

Carpenter v. Farmers’ Mutual Insurance Co., [2008] O.F.S.C.D. No. 111; 

Baker v. ING Insurance Co. of Canada, [2009] O.F.S.C.D. No. 33