Randhawa v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., [2001] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 52

Represented the applicant on a claim for income replacement benefits which was partially allowed. The arbitrator found that the insurer’s unsubstantiated allegations of fraud justified an expense award, as such conduct cannot be condoned “especially in a first party relationship where claimants are injured and vulnerable to threats of repayment and allegations of fraud”.

Cited in:

Vogdanou v. Canadian General Insurance Group, [2001] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 167; 

Borissenko v. RBC General Insurance Co., [2008] O.F.S.C.D. No. 31