Sidhu v. Security National Insurance Co., [2003] O.F.S.C.I.D. No. 93

Successfully represented the insurer on a motion to compel the applicant to attend a psycho-vocational assessment. Leading decision on principles which will be applied by the Commission to determine whether an insurer is entitled to a Section 42 assessment for the purposes of preparing for an arbitration. “The issue before me is squarely, fairness between the parties and an arbitrator’s duty to control the hearing process”.

Cited in:

Ramalingam v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., [2003] O.F.S.C.D. No. 156; 

Zeris v. Aviva Canada, [2004] O.F.S.C.D. No. 73; 

Ramalingam v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., [2004] O.F.S.C.D. No. 184; 

Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., [2007] O.F.S.C.D. No. 56;

Thevaranjan v. Personal Insurance Co. of Canada, [2007] O.F.S.C.D. No. 94; 

State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ramalingam, [2007] O.F.S.C.D. No. 145; 

Ramalingam v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., [2007] O.F.S.C.D. No. 145